Free Web Hosting by Netfirms
Web Hosting by Netfirms | Free Domain Names by Netfirms

T h e

K a s h m i r

T  e  l  e  g  r  a  p  h

Vol I Issue XII

A Kashmir Bachao Andolan Publication

April 2003

I N S I D E


Spotlight 

Deepak Lokhande

 

Editorial     

 

Column     

Yashwant Sinha     

                   

View Point      

Sushil Vakil

 

On Track     

M V Kamath 

         

Opinion

M K Dhar

 

Analysis

Sawraj Singh

 

State Craft

Ram Puniyani

 

Perspective

K G Joglekar

 

Last Word

V Sundaram 

 

                            


BACK ISSUES

 

May 02

June 02

July 02

August 02

September 02

October 02

November 02

December 02

January 03

February 03

March 03

 


About Us

Feedback

Disclaimer

Copyright 

L A S T  W O R D

United States and global terrorism

V Sundaram


The greatest acts of terrorism in the last hundred years have been committed not by furtive gangs of masked desperadoes in different foreign lands. The most horrific acts of terrorism have been committed by governments and their militaries. Here is the official FBI definition of terrorism: 'Terrorism is the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, a civilian population, or any segment, in furtherance of political or economic or social objectives'. Even by its own definition, the hypocrite US government is guilty of terrorism-- on a massive and international scale for nearly 60 years. 

 

In Korea, Vietnam, Kosovo, Somalia, Afghanistan and now in Iraq, the US government has broken international law under the Geneva Convention many times with brutal use of force and horrific violence against persons and property, to intimidate and coerce governments, civilian populations, and many segments thereof, in furtherance of political, social and especially economic objectives. 

 

If 'terrorism' means intimidation by violence or the threat of violence, and if we allow the definition to include violence by States and agents of States, then it is these States, not isolated individuals or small groups, that are the most important terrorists in the world. Viewed in this light, the US government is the greatest terrorist in the world today. 

 

If terrorist violence is measured by the extent of politically motivated torture and murder, it is in the US-sponsored and protected authoritian States -- the real terror network-- that these forms of violence have reached a crescendo in recent decades. After the fall of Germany in May 1945, Hitler's Ministers and Generals were arraigned before the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal established by the Allies for various war crimes. 

 

By letting loose unprovoked and unwarranted violence and aggression against a small country like Iraq, Bush and Blair are guilty of the same war crimes as were committed by Hitler and his criminal gang in Nazi Germany. Robert Jackson, American Prosecutor, Nuremberg War Crimes Trial, cryptically stated in 1946 in open court: 'If certain acts of violation of treaties are crimes, they are crimes whether the United States does them or whether Germany does them, and we are not prepared to lay down a rule of criminal conduct against others which we would not be willing to have invoked against us'. Tragically for mankind as a whole, the times today have changed. 

 

The US government is guilty of double standards and hypocritical conduct in its foreign relations with different countries. Republican Conservatives in USA demand that the United States should be exempt from the jurisdiction of an International Criminal Court, a permanent tribunal established at The Hague , Netherlands. For the 2001 World Conference Against Terrorism, the US government authorised the allocation of a paltry $ 250,000 compared to over $10 million provided to conference organisers by the Ford Foundation. For three decades, the US government refused to ratify the 1965 United Nations Convention on Elimination of Terrorism. Is it any wonder that most of the Third World countries question the US motives? 

 

The carpet bombing of Iraq seems to Third World observers to have less to do with the suppression of terrorism, weapons of mass destruction, chemical and biological warfare, an d more with securing future petroleum production rights in Central Asia. The US media and opinion-makers repeatedly have gone out of their way to twist facts to distort the political realities of the Middle East. A likely consequence of the current US war against Iraq will be an enormous intensification of inter-imperialist conflicts--principally between the United States and its major economic and geopolitical competitors. Thus, a very definite stage is being set. 

 

Apart from the global geo-strategic and economic motivations, there is yet another critical factor in the political equation that induces the U S government today to go on the path of Hitler and Mussolini. Throughout the past decade, US policy experts have expressed concern over growing signs of a decay of social cohesion in USA. Samuel Huntington, who is best known for his book 'The Clash of Civilisations', warned several years ago that the end of the Cold War in the late 1980s had deprived the US government of a cause that could foster mass support for the State. There did not seem to exist, he wrote, any genuine sense of national interests that commanded widespread support. 

 

The problem noted by Huntington, however , is not primarily ideological. It is rooted in increasingly irreconcilable social conflicts within American Society. It is becoming even more difficult to mask the massive social inequality that presently characterises American society. The concentration of extraordinary levels of personal wealth among a very small percentage of the population has far reaching social implications, no matter how vigorously the mass media glorifies the rich and their lifestyles. 

 

The erosion of democratic norms and the ever-more apparent dysfunctional state of American politics are objective consequences of social polarisation. In the year 2000, for the first time since the aftermath of the Civil War in 19th century, it was not possible to arrive a t a democratic resolution of the election. In the end, the plutocracy handpicked the President. The existing two-party system, whose personnel are utterly dependent on the financial support of the plutocracy, is thoroughly unrepresentative of the general population. How else can one explain the fact that the deep unease and ambivalence felt by millions of Americans towards the drive toward war in Iraq find virtually no articulation in the political establishment. Rather, the political establishment, whose constituencies are different fractions of the richest 2 per cent of the population in USA, is absolutely incapable of giving voice to the concern and interests of the broad masses. 

 

Let me now document the sad story of American war crimes in Asia, Middle-East, and the rest of world during the last 50 years. The current regimes of Bush the Bully and Blair the Blinking are indistinguishable from the worst features of Hitler's Nazism, Stalin's communalism and Mao Tse Tung's Cultural Revolution in China. The current Anglo-American attack on Iraq excels all forms of wickedness in the technological efficiency of its cruelty and ferocious aggression. As William Shrier observed in 1973: 'Until we go through it ourselves, until our people cower in the shelters of New York, Washington, Chicago, Boston, Los Angles and elsewhere while buildings collapse overhead and burst into flames, and bodies hurtle about and, when it is over for the day or the night, emerge in the rubble to find some of their dear ones mangled, their homes gone, their hospitals, churches, schools demolished--only after that gruesome experience will we realise what we are inflicting on the people of Indo-China.' 

 

The Korean people were victims of atrocious cirmes in the US-launched Korean war from 1950 to 1953. In the three-year war, about 6 million Korean people were sacrificed and 4 million of the total war dead were civilians, not combatants. But the world knows only distorted facts about this act of American international terrorism, because mass media and major powers of the world have schemed to cover up the truth on a large-scale for fear of the disclosure of facts about US troops atrocities. 

 

Mori Masataka, chief of investigation team of historical fact of US germ warfare during Korean War, states emphatically that US committed germ warfare in Korea by using Japanese Imperial Army's Unit No.731 The weapons of mass destruction used by the US troops during the Korean War included more than 15 million napalm bombs. The biological and chemical warfare committed by the US forces during the Korean War was a deliberate and premeditated criminal act to exterminate the Korean nation and severely destroy the land of Korea. In my considered view the greatest crime since World War -II has been US foreign policy.

Home

 Copyright©2002-2003 Kashmir Bachao Andolan

All Rights Reserved